-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: Refactor prefixes #99
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some conceptual recommendations - first I wasn't convinced of the general approach of moving the prefixes to the config, but I think this would be a great opportunity to add additional flexibility to the link config and enable the user to define the custom fields individually while having save defaults
I don't know how the tests fail. The test doesn't exist like that with the parametrization anymore. So the tests are not in the state of the latest commit. |
Instead of adding them during the serialization
Co-authored-by: micha91 <[email protected]>
69f7f16
to
d27e28d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one minor things and we are good to go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
This PR changes the handling of prefixes (type_prefix and role_prefix) such that these are added during loading of the configuration instead of adding them during the serialization of
WorkItem
s orWorkItemLink
s.